Results tagged ‘ Matsuzaka ’

2009 Chicago Cubs – Smoke and Mirrors?

Out in Left Field’s deep look at specific clubs continues with a dissection of the Chicago Cubs.  The Cubs won 97 games in 2008 and took the NL Central by brute force.  They signed Kosuke Fukudome, at the time the hottest Japanese import of the year, and midseason moves brought them ace starter Rich Harden.  Closer-turned-starter Ryan Dempster had an especially successful season, logging over 200 innings and winning 17 games with an ERA under 3.00.  Rookie of the Year catcher Geovany Soto slugged a season OPS of over .800 to become one of the primary run scorers.

The Chicago Cubs are rightfully the favorite to win the weak NL Central in 2009 if everything goes their way.

Not so fast.  If everything goes their way.

2009 Hot Stove Activity:

Arrived:

  • Milton Bradley (OF)
  • Joey Gathright (OF)
  • Aaron Miles (2B)
  • Luis Vizcaino (RP)
  • Kevin Gregg (RP)
  • Garrett Olson (SP)

Departed:

  • Mark DeRosa (2B,3B,1B,OF)
  • Bob Howry (RP)
  • Jason Marquis (SP)
  • Kerry Wood (CL)
  • Jim Edmonds (OF)
  • Jon Lieber (SP/RP)
  • Felix Pie (OF)

 

Off-Season Analysis:

On paper, the Cubs still have one of the most potent lineups in the National League, and arguably have the best starting rotation.  The bullpen is above-average as well.  The combination of Derrick Lee, Aramis Ramirez, Soto, Alfonso Soriano, and Bradley is a murderous sequence of hitters for an opposing pitcher to wade through.  Miles and Ryan Theriot are less threatening, but are tough at-bats that will do a nice job of creating RBI opportunities for the sluggers.

The signing of Gathright makes no sense.  The speedy center fielder is the not-so-proud owner of a .583 OPS in 2008 (which is 404th out of 435 batters that logged at least 100 AB).  What is the purpose of being fast if you rarely leave home plate?  That is a rhetorical question.  Reed Johnson, when healthy, is an under-rated hitter who can play a decent Center Field.  Gathright has seemingly no use on this team (or in the majors) except as a late-inning defensive replacement and pinch-runner.

Bradley has played as many as 141 games during a season only once in his career and rarely tops 100.  His stints on the disabled list are well-publicized.  Nobody can argue that Bradley is a potential MVP candidate when healthy, but he has NEVER stayed healthy long enough for it to become a reality.  This three-year contract is an extremely risky play for the Cubs.  High-reward, but extremely high-risk.  Only time can tell if this gamble will pay off.

Losing DeRosa is going to sting in a couple months as the Cubs begin to need the flexibility of an excellent bat who can play virtually any position on the field.  The consequences of this trade will echo when Bradley makes his obligatory DL visits.

Depth – The Cubs’ Achilles Heel:

Here is what the Cubs’ starting roster might look like on opening day, 2009:

C

Geovany Soto

1B

Derrick Lee

2B

Aaron Miles

3B

Aramis Ramirez

SS

Ryan Theriot

LF

Alfonso Soriano

CF

Reed Johnson

RF

Milton Bradley

 

 

SP

Carlos Zambrano

SP

Rich Harden

SP

Ted Lilly

SP

Ryan Dempster

SP

Sean Marshall

CL

Carlos Marmol

SU

Kevin Gregg

 

Again, on paper, this is a championship team.

Let’s play “What-If”.  All of these scenarios are very possible, based on history of these players and other players in similar circumstances:

  • What if Bradley gets hurt? (Bradley averages 89.5 games played between 2005 and 2008) 
      • Fukudome plays right field
  •  What if Soriano gets hurt? (Soriano averages 139.75 games played between 2005 and 2008) 
      • Johnson plays Left Field full-time and Gathright becomes the full-time Center-Fielder
  • What if Soto has off-days? 
      • Koyie Hill is the backup catcher (who??)
  • What if there is a 2B platoon?
      • Mike Fontenot takes over the other half
  • What if Harden gets hurt? (Harden averages 14.25 starts per season between 2005 and 2008) 
      • Olson has starting experience
  • What if Dempster breaks down under his work load? (Dempster has not been a starter since the minor leagues until 2008)
      • Rich Hill has starting exprience
  • What if Marshall does not pan out as a full-time starter? (He’s never pitched more than 125 innings in a season in the majors)
      • Chad Gaudin has starting experience

 

All of a sudden, the Cubs’ roster looks like this:

 

C

 

Koyie Hill

1B

Derrick Lee

2B

Mike Fontenot

3B

Aramis Ramirez

SS

Ryan Theriot

LF

Reed Johnson

CF

Joey Gathright

RF

Kosuke Fukudome

 

 

SP

Carlos Zambrano

SP

Garrett Olson

SP

Ted Lilly

SP

Rich Hill

SP

Chad Gaudin

CL

Carlos Marmol

SU

Kevin Gregg

 

Yikes.  All of a sudden the lineup contains a light-hitting 2B, three light-hitting outfielders, one of which can not hit his way out of a wet paper bag (I’ll leave it to you to figure out which one), and there is no lineup protection for Lee and Ramierz.  Who is Koyie Hill?  In the starting rotation, after Zambrano, none of the starters sport a career ERA under 4.00.  That is not terrible, but “average” will not win a World Series with a lineup like that.  And all of a sudden the loss of the ultra-talented but underperforming prospect Felix Pie begins to bite back.

 

A lot of clubs have issues with team depth, but some are better at handling it than others.  Nobody can realistically expect all of the above things to occur, but two or three of them is very possible and would cause a huge problem with this team.

 

The Cubs have already been annointed as a 2009 playoff team and World Series contender due to the strength of their rotation and starting lineup.  But compare the above to another team that has been annointed and had a similar record in 2008.

 

Here’s what the Boston Red Sox‘ starting roster might look like:

 

C

 

Jason Varitek*

1B

Kevin Youkilis

2B

Dustin Pedroia

3B

Mike Lowell

SS

Jed Lowrie

LF

Jason Bay

CF

Jacoby Ellsbury

RF

J.D. Drew

 

 

SP

Josh Beckett

SP

Daisuke Matsuzaka

SP

Jon Lester

SP

Tim Wakefield

SP

Brad Penny

CL

Jon Papelbon

SU

Hideki Okajima

 

*Varitek has not signed yet, but probably will.  This roster does not include DH David Ortiz for comparison sake.

 

Again, let’s play “What If”:

 

  • What if Lowell gets hurt or does not recover well from his surgery? 
      • Youkilis moves from first to third, and Mark Kotsay fills in at first, a position he played some last year, and Kotsay carries a decent stick.  Ortiz can also play there if absolutely required.
  • What if Drew gets hurt?  (injury-prone) 
      • The Sox have ultra-talented Rocco Baldelli to fill in.
  • What if Lowrie stinks? (mostly unproven) 
      • The Sox have Julio Lugo, who at least has good experience and has had some success in the majors.
  • What if Beckett gets hurt, Lester can’t repeat his 2008 performance, and Penny fails? 
      • The backups are John Smoltz, Clay Buchholz, and Justin Masterson, who are not ideal but have a hell of a lot more talent and upside than the Cubs’ fill-in starting pitchers.
  • What if Varitek needs a day off? (or is not signed) 
      • Josh Bard could be a starting catcher almost anywhere else, and would be a good backup in Boston.

 

So now the Sox’ lineup looks like this:

 

C

 

Josh Bard

1B

Mark Kotsay

2B

Dustin Pedroia

3B

Kevin Youkilis

SS

Julio Lugo

LF

Jason Bay

CF

Jacoby Ellsbury

RF

Rocco Baldelli

 

 

SP

John Smoltz

SP

Daisuke Matsuzaka

SP

Clay Buchholz

SP

Justin Masterson

SP

Tim Wakefield

CL

Jon Papelbon

SU

Hideki Okajima

 

While not as ideal as their opening-day roster, the Red Sox’ backup plan looks more fearsome than does the Cubs’ alternate lineup.  This Sox lineup could easily remain competitive and win many of their games until either their starters are healed or a move is made to fix the hole.

 

SUMMARY:

 

The point to be made here is other clubs that have depth issues (Chicago White Sox, San Francisco Giants, Colorado Rockies, etc.) are not being hailed as sure-fire playoff contenders, and for many good reasons.  But the Cubs, due to their market saturation and high-spending ways, are a darling of sports prognosticators everywhere.  A close examination of all of last year’s playoff teams would likely show that all had the depth to weather the aches and pains that always come during a typical season.  Even the Cubs last season with Edmonds, DeRosa, Fontenot, Fukudome, Wood, and Marquis were deeper than they are now.

 

Sacrificing depth for flash could bring the Cubs back down to Earth from the realms of high expectations.  The Cubs are gambling everything on their team being healthy in 2009.  They are still the clear favorite to win the NL Central, but a few predictable injuries, particularly to Bradley, Soriano, and Harden could put this team into a tailspin that would land them in third or fourth in the division.  The Astros, Cardinals, and Brewers‘ clubs do not look as flashy up top, but they are much deeper and will have the depth to continue consistent play in the face of a few injuries.  The Cubs will not have that luxury, and the division race will be much closer than some experts think. 

 

 And there is one more question looming:  What if the Cubs are sold and the new owners wish to cut payroll?

Yankees, Red Sox, Rays Hot Stove Analysis

Most sports news venues have at least one (hundred) article(s) on the following theme:
“Yankees spending spree makes them a bona-fide contender in 2009!”  The signings of CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, and Mark Teixeira certainly were headline-grabbing, and the signing of OBP machine Nick Swisher, only a couple of years removed from a 40-homer season, has been overlooked

In addition, it now seems that the Boston Red Sox have inherited the expectation of playoff “birthright” that was the Yankees’ in the 1990′s, despite an increasingly aging roster that showed signs of declining performance for several of their biggest stars in 2008.

Here is an analysis of how the pitching stacks up for the top three teams in the AL East.  The Orioles will stink as usual, and the Blue Jays have lost three of their best four starting pitchers to injury or free agency for 2009.

The spreadsheet below is a breakdown of the average of all three rotations’ stats for the last three years, applied to a point system (1 to 15, ranked against each other and nobody else).  The point system includes “ingangible” modifiers, and is intended to compare the complete rotation of these three teams against each other (not the entire league).  Lowest collective score is best.

AL East.xls

Boston Red Sox:

Rotation: Rotation Score: 228
Josh Beckett, Jon Lester, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Tim Wakefield, Brad Penny

Projected Batting order (if I were running the show)
CF Jacoby Ellsbury
2B Dustin Pedroia
DH David Ortiz
1B Kevin Youkilis
RF J.D. Drew
LF Jason Bay
3B Mike Lowell
SS Jed Lowrie / Julio Lugo
C Jason Varitek

Key Signings (as of 12/29/2008):  SP Brad Penny.  Lost:  Manny Ramirez

The
Red Sox did a smart thing acquiring Jason Bay for Manny Ramirez.  Bay
will never be the “greatest right-handed hitter ever”, but he is young,
he plays hard, and he can hit.  The incentive of playing a
full season for a contender will be huge for him.  Actually, playing for a
team that’s not one of the worst in the majors will be an incentive enough to play at his best.

Big questions about the lineup include:
1)  Who is playing Short Stop?  Can’t the Sox find somebody good?
2)  Will Ellsbury shake the sophomore jinx, or was 2008 more in line of the type of player he is?
3)  Can Ortiz, Lowell, Drew, and Beckett stay healthy for a full season together?
4)  Is Dustin Pedroia for real?
5)  Can Brad Penny resurrect his career?

Nice
segue.  Two season ago, Brad Penny was the NL starter in the All Star
Game.  His career ERA is a very nice 4.06, and before 2008 he struck
out a respectable 6-1/2 batters per nine innings.  Then he fell apart.  Injury? 
Mental issues?  Here we have one of the most dependable pitchers in the past
nine seasons who was demoted to the minor leagues just one season removed
from his All-Star start.  What? 

I am thinking Brad Penny
bounces back, and this ends up looking like the genius signing of the Hot Stove
Season.  He’s been playing this game too long to just roll over and
die, and he is still only 30 years old (prime pitching age!).  Low-Risk, High, high, high reward.  Clay Buchholz
needs another season to figure out his command issues anyway. 
Bounce him between AAA and the majors for spot-starts and take the
pressure off.

On paper, the Red Sox have a more
solid rotation than the Yankees.  In actuality, they have injury-prone
and slightly-overrated “ace” Beckett (more on that later), a
one-season (so far) wonder in Lester, Wakefield – a 42 year-old
knuckleballer, Penny, and Matsuzaka, a power pitcher who threw almost
as many walks in 2008 as Mussina, James Shields, and Andy Sonnanstine did in
609 innings of COMBINED work.

Beckett:  Has anybody noticed
that he seems to alternate Ace-Years and Mid-Rotation-Years?  He’s made
a name pitching in big spots, but his overall numbers are not worthy of
the “Ace” moniker.  A career ERA of 3.78 does not scream Cooperstown. 
Yet how many Bostonians would scream from the rooftop that Beckett is a
MUCH better pitcher than, say, Roy Oswalt or Roy Halladay.  News flash: 
Career ERAs for Oswalt and Halladay are 3.13 and 3.52.  Those are true aces that have the misfortune of playing in mid-market areas where media frenzy is less common.

Lester
has to prove he can do 2008 all over again.  Great story, great
results, but Jon Lester before his illness was not an All-Star quality
pitcher or even prospect.  I hope for his sake he continues his
dominance, but the questions are there.

Overall, the Red Sox
lineup is less fluid than the Yankees, but after several years of
making no major impact moves (Ramirez for Bay was not one), age and
complacency are about to catch up with Boston, as it did in New York
over the past two years.  Another segue.

NY YANKEES:

Rotation: Rotation Score: 196
CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Chien-Ming Wang, Joba Chamberlain, Phil Hughes

Projected Batting order (if I were running the show)
CF Johnny Damon
SS Derek Jeter
1B Mark Teixiera
3B Alex Rodriguez (Oh, the RBI opportunities)
DH Hideki Matsui
RF Nick Swisher (OBP sets up Nady nicely)
LF Xavier Nady
C Jorge Posada (Loyalty to fading C keeps him out of 9 spot)
2B Robinson Cano

Yankee’s Key Signings (as of 12/29/2008):  SP CC Sabathia, SP A.J. Burnett, 1B Mark Teixiera, 1B/OF Nick Swisher.  Also should receive a healthy Chien-Ming Wang and DH Hideki Matsui back from DL.  Lost:  SP Mike Mussina, SP Andy Pettitte, 1B Jason Giambi, OF Bobby Abreu.

The wow-factor of signing the first three is unmeasurable.  But in reality there is little reason to expect huge improvement in the number of wins from 2008 to 2009.  Mike Mussina was a 20-game winner.  No doubt, Sabathia is one of the best pitchers in baseball, but the odds of him matching or exceeding Mussina’s 2008 win total is even money, at best.  Exchanging Pettitte for Burnett is also a one-for-one.  You are trading an aging but solid control pitcher for an injury-prone power pitcher poised just over the peak of his career.  If Burnett stays healthy, this exchange is a win.  If not, this is an expensive way to not improve.  It will be nice to have Wang back.

Teixiera is a great long-term signing.  But in the short-term, is he really so much better than Giambi offensively that New York can expect a significant win increase?  Giambi still hit 32 HR last year in less than 460 AB, which is right in line with every healthy season he’s had since 1999.  Teixeira will net additional RBI, but will tally 75 more AB and adds no speed threat.  As shown in a previous entry, defense is an overrated commodity in baseball, where championships are concerned.  Teixiera is amazing, but to expect an automatic World Series bid because of his addition is absurd.

Swisher is a good signing, but he does not replace Bobby Abreu, who has been one of the most quietly consistent hitters in the game over the past five years.

It still should concern Yankee’s fans that the 4 and 5 starters in their rotation have next to no starting experience in the majors.  Chamberlain and Hughes are good prospects, but nothing more at this point.  Their value has been over-inflated by fans and media by the pinstripes on their uniform.  Their inexperience offsets the nice signings of Sabathia and Burnett, and until the two young-uns can prove A) They can stay healthy and pitch 180+ innings, and B) they can pitch up to their hype, they are two huge question-marks at the end of a thin rotation.  Chamberlain looks great as a reliever, but 4 out of 5 dentists would prefer David Price as a starter.

Segue number three!

Tampa Bay Rays:

Rotation: Rotation Score: 153
James Shields, Scott Kazmir, Matt Garza, David Price, Andy Sonnanstine

Projected Batting order (if I were running the show)
2B Akinori Iwamura
CF B.J. Upton
1B Carlos Pena
3B Evan Longoria
LF Carl Crawford
RF Matt Joyce
DH Gabe Gross
C Dioner Navarro
SS Jason Bartlett

Key Signings (as of 12/29/2008):  RF Matt Joyce.  Lost:  Cliff Floyd

The Rays were the “surprise” team of 2008.  Many expected them to be competitive, and possibly contend in 2009 or 2010, but few if any authorities tabbed them as World Series participants before the season began.

The Rays will be better in 2009, and by using the best means available – allowing their already ridiculously talented but young roster to mature another year.

Joyce is an overlooked but nice signing.  He will not hit for average, but in limited time as a rookie last season (242 AB), he clonked 12 homers with a .831 OPS while platooning with Gary Sheffield.  As a full-time player, there’s no reason his minor league numbers cannot translate to 25 HR, albiet with an on-base % of .320 at best.  He seems to be a very solid 6- or 7-hitter in the mold of Luke Scott or Jayson Werth.  The only real concern should be having too many BA sinkholes (Joyce, Gross, Pena) in the lineup.  These should be offset by the superstars.

Speaking of superstars (Upton, Crawford, and Longoria), everybody who looks at historical stats can predict a significant improvement from them in 2009.  Longoria was fantastic as a rookie, but this guy has no talent ceiling.  Upton and Crawford both suffered poor 2008 seasons (for them), especially in power and base running due to nagging injuries.  Health alone, plus another year of experience for “E-Long” should prop up the offense.  Defense will be improved with Joyce or Gross in Right Field full-time, but who cares?

None of this really matters, because the Rays have one of the top starting rotations in the majors.

Check this out.  Name the pitcher:

Age: 25
IP: 193.1
W/L:  13-9
ERA: 4.38
K: 124
BB: 37

Who wouldn’t want this guy as the #3 or #4 starter on their club?  But alas, he is the overlooked member of the Rays’ staff, their back-of-the-rotation guy, Andy Sonnanstine.  Also, those numbers are vastly improved over his 2007 Rookie stats.  In AA and AAA, he never posted a season’s ERA over 2.67 (185 IP in AA, 2006).  So this guy can be expected to improve even more.  Sub-4.00 ERA and 15 wins in 2009 is not unreasonable, due to a BB/9 ratio that is only rivalled by the afore-mentioned Mussina- and Maddux-types of the world.  Not too shabby for a fifth starter.

But enough gushing about their number five pitcher.  Garza wields a sub-4.00 ERA and should improve.  Kazmir is one of the dominant power pitchers in baseball: 10th in the AL in K’s despite pitching only 152 innings due to an injury in 2008.  Shields is one of the most quietly controlled and dependable starters in all of baseball (6th in the AL with 6.5 IP per start).  And then there’s the most-hyped and most-talented pitching prospect since Tim Lincecum (or even before?) – David Price.

Here are their ages:  23, 24, 25, 25, 27.  Kazmir is 25 and has five years of MLB experience already!  Most major league pitchers seem to hit their prime between the ages of 28 and 32.  So all five should expect slight (or major) improvements in their game.

The Rays pitching staff is too talented, too young, and too solid for them to be overlooked.

The point of this blog is to show that despite the Yankees’ spending spree and the Red Sox media machine, the Rays are still the team to beat in the AL East in 2009.  Fans should resist the temptation to jump to conclusions over a few high-profile signings or by a history of recent success in the face of age and injury.

AL East Prediction 2009:
1. TB Rays
2. NY Yankees
3. BOS Red Sox
4. TOR Blue Jays
5. BAL Orioles

P.S. No I did not add the “modifiers” in the spreadsheet to favor the Rays.  The Rays had the best score even without the modifiers, but players like Price, Hughes, Buchholz, and Kennedy had ridiculously small scores due to body-of-work.

Drafting Pitchers

In Fantasy Baseball, managers adopt different strategies to compete in their leagues.  One strategy which has never seemed successful to me is to load up on good starting pitching, either by drafting three or four in the first seven rounds of the draft, or by holding on to a large number of quality pitchers in long-term keeper drafts.

By nature, pitching is dependent on calculated stats instead of accumulated stats.  Calculated pitching stats include Earned Run Average (ERA), strikeouts per nine innings pitched (K/9), and Walks plus Hits per Inning Pitched (WHIP) in most of my leagues.  Other stat categories, such as Wins earned, Losses earned, and Saves are largely controlled by the team behind the pitcher.  Every fantasy team needs at least one closer, so I am throwing Saves out of this analysis.  Forget them.  Wins and Losses seem almost random.  In 2005, Roger Clemens threw over 210 innings, with an ERA of 1.87.  He earned 13 Wins due to lack of run support by his team.  Therefore I contend that a manager should never draft a pitcher due to their Win-Loss record.

Hitters are defined in all cases except for Batting Average (BA) and On-Base Plus Slugging Percentage (OPS) by cumulative stats.  Runs, Home Runs, Runs Batted In (RBI), Stolen Bases are all controlled by the player themselves and the pitcher they are facing.  Other than AVG and OPS, a player’s fantasy stat contribution is not affected by the other players on the fantasy team.

My team came in second place in my biggest keeper league in 2007, with the following pitching staff:

Brandon Webb, James Shields, Jeff Francis, Shaun Marcum, Chad Gaudin, Jose Valverde, Joaquin Benoit, and Joel Zumaya.

This gave me a “staff” ERA of 3.77, WHIP of 1.27, and K/9 7.56.

An argument came up recently about how many top-tier pitchers should be kept for the following year when 10 keepers are allowed.  This is assuming a team has more than 10 keeper-worthy players.

I contend that only two of the most elite pitchers should be kept and the others traded during the fantasy off-season.  The reason is that a fantasy staff needs only two “star” pitchers and a good draft of above-average pitchers to be extremely competitive.

To compare, I substituted a few top-tier, but non-elite pitchers for the the worst of my starting pitchers, Chad Gaudin, to see how it affected my calculated stats.  I did not use an elite pitcher for an example because of the assumption that all elite pitchers (Peavy, Webb, Santana, etc.) would be kept already.

Pitcher With (instead of Gaudin):

Roy Halladay:  Team ERA 3.65 (-0.12), WHIP 1.22 (-0.05), K/9 7.29 (-0.27)

Javier Vazquez:  Team ERA 3.66 (-0.11), WHIP 1.20 (-0.07), K/9 7.89 (+0.33)

Daisuke Matsuzaka:  Team ERA 3.77 (+/- 0.00), WHIP 1.24 (-0.03), K/9, 7.88 (+0.32)

Fausto Carmona:  Team ERA 3.54 (-0.23), WHIP 1.22 (-0.05), K/9 7.34 (-0.22)

Roy Oswalt:  Team ERA 3.56 (-0.12), WHIP 1.24 (-0.03), K/9 7.48 (-0.08)

Felix Hernandez:  Team ERA 3.68 (-0.09), WHIP 1.24 (-0.03), K/9 7.70 (+0.14)

So from the stats above, substituting any of the above “second tier” starting pitchers with a low-tier starting pitcher like Chad Gaudin makes very little impact on the overall stats of a fantasy pitching team.  One could argue that a player like Carmona significantly helps ERA, until you realize that WHIP is virtually the same, and K/9 is harmed an equal amount to the boost in ERA.

My point is that if a manager feels comfortable with their fantasy drafting skill, they should target one or two very good pitchers (or keep them!) in the first few rounds of the draft, and then identify many above-average pitchers or “sleepers” in the early “teen” draft rounds.

To compare, the team that won the league above had the following calculated stats for his staff:

Team ERA 3.47, Team WHIP 1.16, Team K/9 8.05.

His staff was Jeremy Bonderman, Rich Hill, Kyle Kendrick, Roy Oswalt, Johan Santana, JJ Putz, Takashi Saito, and Huston Street.

After 2006, the only keeper-quality starters on that list were Santana and Oswalt.  The other three starters were risks coming in to 2007 because they had no track record.  Rich Hill turned out to be a gold mine in 2007.  That, along with three dominant relievers, made his calculated stats what they were.  Good managing, not early pitcher drafting, made these stats.

Even replacing my worst pitcher with a guy like Halladay or Vazquez would not allow my staff to compare favorably to his.  He and I used the same strategy, and it panned out better for him, but I would have been worse off had I wasted top draft picks on starting pitching instead of hitters whose accumulative stats make them more valuable overall to a fantasy team.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.